Publication: Embodied realism by design in Thai management education
Issued Date
2018-07-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14728117
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85046017328
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Management Education. Vol.16, No.2 (2018), 281-291
Suggested Citation
Astrid Kainzbauer, Sidney Lowe Embodied realism by design in Thai management education. International Journal of Management Education. Vol.16, No.2 (2018), 281-291. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2018.04.005 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/45357
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Embodied realism by design in Thai management education
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd In response to calls for changes to make management education more relevant in increasingly ‘messy’ unpredictable and complex business contexts, we report in this paper on a more situated, exploratory learning approach emphasizing experimentation, intuition and imaginative reflection. We explore an alternative approach to teaching management in a Thai Master's program using an emic-idiographic, interpretivist approach. In doing so, we do not claim generalizability of findings as the focus is in providing a ‘thick description’ of an innovative pedagogy and its effectiveness for a particular group of Thai learners in a business school in Bangkok. Through the literature on design thinking and embodied realism, we present an abductive tool particularly suited for the Thai cultural context as it encouraged students to uncover their intuitive insights and to experiment with imaginative exploration and reflection. We report on using this exploratory tool in Thai management classrooms and elaborate on cultural challenges as well as learning benefits we discovered, such as students developing a deeper level of intuitive understanding of organizational issues and exploring the pluralism of meaning-making among team members. We commend the approach as a potentially valuable alternative to what Kuepers & Pauleen (2015) call the dominant ‘cogni-centrism’ in management education.