Publication: Does poverty negate the impact of social norms on cheating?
3
Issued Date
2020-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10902473
08998256
08998256
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85093073175
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Games and Economic Behavior. Vol.124, (2020), 569-578
Suggested Citation
Suparee Boonmanunt, Agne Kajackaite, Stephan Meier Does poverty negate the impact of social norms on cheating?. Games and Economic Behavior. Vol.124, (2020), 569-578. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2020.09.009 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/59960
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Does poverty negate the impact of social norms on cheating?
Author(s)
Abstract
© 2020 The Author(s) Cheating such as corruption and tax evasion is prevalent in the developing world; therefore, many interventions have been undertaken to reduce cheating in developing countries. Although some field evidence shows that poverty is correlated with cheating, the causal effect of poverty on cheating in the field and the effectiveness of interventions for financially constrained people remain an open question. We present results from a lab-in-the-field experiment with low-income rice farmers in Thailand (N = 568), in which we, first, investigate the causal effect of poverty on cheating and, second, test whether poverty affects the effectiveness of a social-norm intervention to reduce cheating. We show poverty itself does not affect willingness to cheat. However, although a social-norm-reminder intervention reduced cheating when the population was richer (after harvest), it had no effect when the population was poorer (before harvest). Our results suggest that the timing of interventions to change behavior might matter.