Publication: Physician awareness, preparedness, and opinions toward consumer-initiated genetic testing in Thailand: Views from a changing landscape
3
Issued Date
2021-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15733599
10597700
10597700
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85105231668
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Genetic Counseling. Vol.30, No.6 (2021), 1535-1543
Suggested Citation
Siraphob Kittikoon, Manop Pithukpakorn, Pornpoj Pramyothin Physician awareness, preparedness, and opinions toward consumer-initiated genetic testing in Thailand: Views from a changing landscape. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Vol.30, No.6 (2021), 1535-1543. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1420 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77593
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Physician awareness, preparedness, and opinions toward consumer-initiated genetic testing in Thailand: Views from a changing landscape
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Consumer-initiated genetic tests have captured public interest in recent years, including in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Thailand. Due to limited resources and personnel, physicians will most likely bear the burden of increasing service needs from the public as consumer-initiated genetic tests become popularized. The primary objective of this study was to describe (a) awareness, (b) preparedness to provide counseling about the consumer-initiated genetic test, and (c) opinions on the usefulness of consumer-initiated genetic tests among physicians at an academic hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. The secondary objective was to describe factors that were associated with the awareness, preparedness, and opinion of the participants. Paper questionnaires were sent out to participants which included internal medicine residents, fellows, and faculty staff members. The questionnaires assessed awareness, preparedness to discuss consumer-initiated genetic test results, and opinion on the usefulness of consumer-initiated genetic tests and included both closed- and open-ended questions. Responses were anonymous. Among 308 participants, there were 223 (72.4%) residents, 14 (4.5%) fellows, and 71 (23.1%) staff members. Only 15% of participants were aware of consumer-initiated genetic tests, mostly from the internet, and only 7% were prepared to provide counseling regarding consumer-initiated genetic tests. However, 60% agreed that consumer-initiated genetic tests may be clinically useful. Many participants, including trainees, expressed concerns about the interpretation of consumer-initiated genetic test results, application into clinical practice, appropriate counseling, and patient referral to geneticists. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that years of work experience was independently associated with awareness of consumer-initiated genetic tests, while male gender and less work experience were independently associated with favorable opinion toward the usefulness of consumer-initiated genetic tests. Our results pointed to an urgent need for genetic counselors in Thailand. Also, physicians, particularly trainees, need appropriate training to prepare them for a rapidly evolving environment where consumer-initiated genetic tests become commonplace.