Publication: Restricted diffusion of the optic nerves in patients with acute optic neuritis: A diagnostic accuracy study
2
Issued Date
2021-02-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85100904608
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.104, No.2 (2021), 271-276
Suggested Citation
Oranan Tritanon, Pakawee Savangned, Tanyatuth Padungkiatsagul, Kavin Vanikieti, Anuchit Poonyathalang, Metha Apiwattanakul, Nattawut Unwanatham, Kunlawat Thadanipon, Jiraporn Laothamatas, Teeratorn Pulkes, Supoch Tunlayadechanont, Panitha Jindahra Restricted diffusion of the optic nerves in patients with acute optic neuritis: A diagnostic accuracy study. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.104, No.2 (2021), 271-276. doi:10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.02.11631 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78467
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Restricted diffusion of the optic nerves in patients with acute optic neuritis: A diagnostic accuracy study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of restricted diffusion of the optic nerves in patients with acute optic neuritis (ON). Materials and Methods: The present study was a diagnostic accuracy study, including all acute ON patients, admitted to Ramathibodi Hospital in Thailand, between January 2014 and December 2018 (ID 075739). Patients were divided into acute ON and non-optic neuritis condition (non-ON) groups. The acute ON group was divided further into neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-associated optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) group and other types of ON (other-ON) group. Patients’ clinical information and MRI scans were reviewed retrospectively. Restricted diffusion of the optic nerves was present if hyperintense signals were observed on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and hypointense signals were observed on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Results: A total of 102 patients were included in the present study (141 optic nerves). Of all patients, 78 had acute ON (76.5%), and 24 had non-ON (23.5%). Of all optic nerves, there were 95 optic nerves in the acute ON group (67.4%) and 46 in the non-ON group (32.6%). Of 95 optic nerves in the acute ON group, there were 52 optic nerves in the NMOSD-ON group (54.7%) and 43 in the other-ON group (45.3%). Restricted diffusion of the optic nerves demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity of 95.7%, positive predictive value of 97.4%, and negative predictive value of 67.7% in identifying acute ON. It had a sensitivity of 86.5%, specificity of 32.6%, positive predictive value of 60.8%, and negative predictive value of 66.7% in differentiating NMOSD-ON from other-ON. Conclusion: The diffusion MRI can be a marker of acute ON. The test is most useful for ruling in acute ON when restricted diffusion is positive. However, further investigations might be required in negative tests. Restricted diffusion is positive in several types of ON. It is difficult to differentiate NMOSD-ON from other ON types using diffusion MRI alone.