Social acceptance of livestock-administered endectocides for malaria control in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Issued Date
2022-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14752875
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85140919694
Pubmed ID
36307857
Journal Title
Malaria Journal
Volume
21
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Malaria Journal Vol.21 No.1 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Makhanthisa T.I., Braack L., Bornman M.S., Lutermann H. Social acceptance of livestock-administered endectocides for malaria control in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Malaria Journal Vol.21 No.1 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12936-022-04334-z Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84843
Title
Social acceptance of livestock-administered endectocides for malaria control in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Malaria continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Africa and conventional malaria control strategies, such as indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated bed nets, have limited effectiveness for some malarial vectors. Consequently, the development of alternative or supplementary strategies is required. One potential strategy is the use of livestock-administered endectocides to control vector mosquitoes that feed outdoors on livestock. However, since this strategy requires support from local communities and livestock owners consenting for their animals to be treated, it can only be implemented if agreed to by affected communities. The aim of this study was to assess the social acceptance of the use of livestock-administered endectocides in the malaria endemic villages of Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa, where malaria incidence is high. Methods: Questionnaires were administered to 103 livestock-owning households from four villages, namely, Gumbu, Malale, Manenzhe and Bale. The assessment included questions on the acceptability of the strategy, the type and number of livestock owned, distances between houses and kraals (overnight pens) as well as previous use and awareness of endectocides. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression. Results: The types of livestock owned by the participants comprised, cattle, goats, sheep and donkeys, with the most dominant being goats (n = 1040) and cattle (n = 964). The majority of kraals were less than 10 m from homesteads. Most participants (72.5%) were already using chemicals to treat their livestock for parasites. All participants were amenable to the implementation of the strategy, and would give consent for their animals to be treated by endectocides. Conclusions: The use of livestock-administered endectocides appears to be a feasible and acceptable approach for control of animal-feeding malaria vector species in the malaria endemic villages of Vhembe District. This is based on a high percentage of rural residents keeping suitable livestock close to their homes and expressing willingness to use endectocides for mosquito control.