International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project
3
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
18686974
eISSN
18686982
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85120363013
Pubmed ID
34719123
Journal Title
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Volume
29
Issue
1
Start Page
161
End Page
173
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences Vol.29 No.1 (2022) , 161-173
Suggested Citation
Ban D. International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences Vol.29 No.1 (2022) , 161-173. 173. doi:10.1002/jhbp.1071 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86726
Title
International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Ageo Central General Hospital
Siriraj Hospital
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Graduate School of Medicine
Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences
Graduate School of Medicine
Graduate School of Medicine
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
GEM Hospital, Coimbatore
Homi Bhabha National Institute
General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Sapienza Università di Roma
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Kagoshima University
Tokyo Women's Medical University
NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Wakayama Medical University
Nippon Medical School
National Cancer Center Hospital
Singapore General Hospital
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Kawasaki Medical School
Mayo Clinic
Tokyo Medical University
Emory University School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
Miami Cancer Institute
Shimonoseki City Hospital
Siriraj Hospital
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Graduate School of Medicine
Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences
Graduate School of Medicine
Graduate School of Medicine
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
GEM Hospital, Coimbatore
Homi Bhabha National Institute
General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Sapienza Università di Roma
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Kagoshima University
Tokyo Women's Medical University
NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Wakayama Medical University
Nippon Medical School
National Cancer Center Hospital
Singapore General Hospital
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Kawasaki Medical School
Mayo Clinic
Tokyo Medical University
Emory University School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
Miami Cancer Institute
Shimonoseki City Hospital
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Surgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy-based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021). Methods: Twenty-five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. Results: Four clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts. Conclusions: The expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.