Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and People with a Spinal Cord Injury on Resistance Exercise Intensity in Japan, Indonesia, Korea and Thailand
Issued Date
2024-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26737272
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85213461348
Journal Title
Disabilities
Volume
4
Issue
4
Start Page
770
End Page
780
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Disabilities Vol.4 No.4 (2024) , 770-780
Suggested Citation
Jung K.S., Chotiyarnwong C., Kusumawardani M.K., Yoon S.H., Chotiyarnwong P., Narasinta I., Tinduh D., Kouda K., Tajima F. Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and People with a Spinal Cord Injury on Resistance Exercise Intensity in Japan, Indonesia, Korea and Thailand. Disabilities Vol.4 No.4 (2024) , 770-780. 780. doi:10.3390/disabilities4040047 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102631
Title
Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and People with a Spinal Cord Injury on Resistance Exercise Intensity in Japan, Indonesia, Korea and Thailand
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aims to investigate differences in the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) on resistance exercise intensity in Asian countries in association with knowledge translation (KT). Also, it verifies the appropriateness of the conventional indicators for resistance exercise intensity in an Asian context. (2) Methods: 121 certified HCPs and 107 adults with SCI participated in a survey conducted in Indonesian, Japanese, Korean and Thai languages. The survey asked what principles are important for prescribing resistance exercise, and if ‘moderate’ and ‘vigorous’ were appropriate terms for indicating an intensity level. Perspective differences were examined between both groups and, further, between countries from a psychosocial perspective. (3) Results: Of the HCPs, 92% perceived that resistance exercise intensity was far more important than frequency, time or type of exercise while frequency (61%) followed by intensity (58%) was perceived as important by respondents with SCI. Only Japanese respondents with SCI agreed with the HCPs’ perception of intensity. Both HCPs and respondents with SCI showed unfavorable responses to the usage of ‘moderate’ and ‘vigorous’ for describing resistance exercise intensity, especially Japanese HCPs and respondents with SCI from Indonesia. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that non-HCPs must improve their perceptions of exercise intensity. Our findings also suggest the need for more explicit and user-friendly terms or expressions indicating the level of intensity in a local (Asian) context.