Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14615185
eISSN
17579988
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85136910055
Pubmed ID
35980238
Journal Title
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume
24
Issue
1
Start Page
291
End Page
300
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Vol.24 No.1 (2022) , 291-300
Suggested Citation
Alam A., Chowdhury A.F.M.A., Yamauti M., Saikaew P., Hoshika S., Carvalho R.M., Sano H., Sidhu S.K. Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Vol.24 No.1 (2022) , 291-300. 300. doi:10.3290/j.jad.b3240695 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/110558
Title
Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether varying thicknesses of universal adhesives utilizing the additional coating strategy would affect their microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin, hardness, and elastic modulus (mechanical properties). Materials and Methods Ninety-nine human maxillary premolars were cut to expose coronal dentin, ground with regu lar-grit diamond burs, and randomly distributed into nine groups based on 1. adhesive: Scotchbond Universal Adhe sive (SB; universal), G Premio Bond (GP; universal) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB; two-step self-etch; control); and 2. application strategy (one, two or three coats; each coat light cured). After adhesive application and resin composite buildup, the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (37°C; 24 h). Resin-dentin sticks from eight premolars per group (each premolar yielded three sticks; n 24 sticks altogether) were prepared for the μTBS test, followed by mea surement of the adhesive thicknesses at their fractured ends using SEM. The mechanical properties of the adhesive layers produced by different coats were evaluated on separate resin-dentin slices (n = 3 teeth per group). Results Two coats significantly increased the μTBS (p 0.001) of all the adhesives. The correlation between adhe sive thickness and bond strength was positive for GP but negative for SB. MB did not show any correlation. Additional coating significantly increased the mechanical properties of GP (p 0.05) but did not affect SB and MB (p 0.05). Conclusion An additional adhesive coating over the manufacturers’ recommendations improved the bond strength of all the adhesives tested. However, the increased mechanical properties of the adhesives with additional curing was material dependent