Publication: A case study of the co-production approach to the implementation of education for sustainable development in Thailand
Issued Date
2018-04-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14782103
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85046712245
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Policy Futures in Education. Vol.16, No.3 (2018), 327-345
Suggested Citation
Suwida Nuamcharoen, Nopraenue S. Dhirathiti A case study of the co-production approach to the implementation of education for sustainable development in Thailand. Policy Futures in Education. Vol.16, No.3 (2018), 327-345. doi:10.1177/1478210317739487 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47416
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A case study of the co-production approach to the implementation of education for sustainable development in Thailand
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Thailand is a good example of a developing country which is struggling with globally common problems in trying to find solutions for sustainable education development. Education is one of the important methods to build the mindset of Thai people toward sustainable development (SD). The co-production approach is a way of improving public services, including education for sustainable development (ESD). The study employs qualitative research techniques which aim at studying the implementation and co-production of ESD. Moreover, it is to explore and synthesize the implementation characteristics of co-producing ESD in Thailand. The research found 12 correlated indicators from the literature that link SD, ESD and co-production practices. They were categorized into input, process and output of the cycle of implementing and co-producing ESD. The indicators were examined within the context of the case study of Bansankong School. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders that included representatives from the school administration, families and communities, local authorities, other relevant institutions and volunteers. The results showed that factors in the process portion of the cycle of implementing and co-producing ESD tended to be more significant; these were community engagement, information technology and media usage, and the contingency approach. The factors in the input portion of the process, namely, self-reliance and self-efficiency of population and leadership, and the factor of mutual benefits in the output portion proved to be significant. The other seven factors, cultural adaptation, democratic participation, equitability, goal of sustainable future, interdependence, interdisciplinary approaches and collaborative approach and partnership, appeared to be non-significant.