Publication: Family Function in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients Residing In a Developing Country
Issued Date
2020-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
18732623
00411345
00411345
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85081627432
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Transplantation Proceedings. (2020)
Suggested Citation
N. Butsriphum, S. Getsuwan, W. Prabpram, J. Chuthapisith, P. Tanpowpong, C. Lertudomphonwanit, S. Treepongkaruna Family Function in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients Residing In a Developing Country. Transplantation Proceedings. (2020). doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.035 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53803
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Family Function in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients Residing In a Developing Country
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Background: Pediatric liver transplantation (LT) can affect recipients’ family function; however, inconsistent results between studies exist, and data from developing nations are sparse. We aimed to evaluate family function and identify factors associated with suboptimal function in pediatric LT recipients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed at a teaching hospital in Bangkok, Thailand between May 2018 and December 2018. We included the families of children aged 2 to 18 years who underwent LT for at least 1 year. Chulalongkorn Family Inventory (CFI) was used to evaluate the family function in these children comparing with families of healthy children. Family function was interpreted from the total CFI score and characterized as dysfunctional, normal-functioned, and well-functioned. Results: We enrolled families of 82 LT recipients and 72 healthy children. LT recipients had median age of 7.4 (interquartile range: 4.5-10.3) years. Eighteen children (22%) had a single parent, and at least one unemployed parent was reported in 25%. Most (96%) had well-functioned families, and none had a dysfunctional family. Furthermore, the total score was not significantly different between families of LT and healthy children (P = .95). LT families had a higher score in problem-solving (P < .01) and lower score in the affective involvement and general functioning dimension (P < .01 and .02, respectively). Among the LT children, postoperative bile leakage was associated with lower overall family function score. Conclusions: Even though most recipients had good family function, physicians should pay close attention to specific aspects of family function, especially in children with certain postoperative complications.