Superficial Intradermal Injections of Cohesive Polydensified Matrix Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for the Improvement of Facial Pores and Skin Quality: A Split-Face Randomized Study
| dc.contributor.author | Rutnumnoi T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Palakornkitti P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anuntrangsee T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yongpisarn T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sakpuwadol N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vachiramon V. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Rutnumnoi T. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-11T18:18:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-11T18:18:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Various therapeutic options have been introduced for enlarged facial pores including low cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Newer formulations of HA-based dermal fillers are continuously introduced into the market, but their effectiveness in reducing enlarged facial pores has not yet been determined. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of HA-based dermal fillers (Cohesive Polydensified Matrix HA filler; CPM-HA20) versus CPM-HA20 with glycerol (CPM-HA20G) in terms of minimizing enlarged facial pores and skin quality improvement. Methods: Thirty subjects with enlarged facial pores were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, split-face study. Participants were randomly assigned to be injected with 1 mL of CPM-HA20 filler on one side of their medial cheek and 1 mL of CPM-HA20G on the contralateral side for 3 sessions spaced 4 weeks apart. Pore volume was objectively measured by an Antera 3D. Skin biophysical properties were evaluated. Participant satisfaction and adverse events were recorded. Results: Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Both treatment groups showed a reduction in the mean pore volume from the baseline through Week 32. The CPM-HA20G treated side showed a 24.2% higher reduction in mean pore volume from baseline compared to the CPM-HA20 treated side (p = 0.038). Both treatment groups showed improvement in skin hydration from baseline to Week 32. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the CPM-HA20G and CPM-HA20 treated sides. Only mild adverse events such as pain, edema, and bruising were reported. Conclusion: Three-monthly injections of CPM-HA20G and CPM-HA20 were effective in minimizing enlarged face pores and improving skin hydration. CPM-HA20G demonstrated superior efficacy in terms of pore size reduction. Adverse events were generally mild and tolerable. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Vol.24 No.5 (2025) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jocd.70209 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 14732165 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14732130 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105004210801 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/110046 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | Superficial Intradermal Injections of Cohesive Polydensified Matrix Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for the Improvement of Facial Pores and Skin Quality: A Split-Face Randomized Study | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105004210801&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 5 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 24 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Naresuan University | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University |
