Cost-Effectiveness of Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis From Thailand

dc.contributor.authorWongseree P.
dc.contributor.authorHasgul Z.
dc.contributor.authorJalali M.S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWongseree P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T18:07:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T18:07:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of increasing access to colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, considering resource limitations in Thailand. Methods: We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of increasing access to fecal immunochemical test screening (strategy I), symptom evaluation (strategy II), and their combination through healthcare and societal perspectives using Colo-Sim, a simulation model of CRC care. We extended our analysis by adding a risk-stratification score (RS) to the strategies. We analyzed all strategies under the currently limited annual colonoscopy capacity and sufficient capacity. We estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs over 2023 to 2047 and performed sensitivity analyses. Results: Annual costs for CRC care will increase over 25 years in Thailand, resulting in a cumulative cost of 323B Thai baht (THB). Each strategy results in higher QALYs gained and additional costs. With the current colonoscopy capacity and willingness-to-pay threshold of 160 000 THB, strategy I with and without RS is not cost-effective. Strategy II + RS is the most cost-effective, resulting in 0.68 million QALYs gained with additional costs of 66B THB. Under sufficient colonoscopy capacity, all strategies are deemed cost-effective, with the combined approach (strategy I + II + RS) being the most favorable, achieving the highest QALYs (1.55 million) at an additional cost of 131 billion THB. This strategy also maintains the highest probability of being cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay threshold above 96 000 THB. Conclusions: In Thailand, fecal immunochemical test screening, symptom evaluation, and RS use can achieve the highest QALYs; however, boosting colonoscopy capacity is essential for cost-effectiveness.
dc.identifier.citationValue in Health Regional Issues Vol.43 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101010
dc.identifier.eissn22121102
dc.identifier.issn22121099
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195034069
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/98682
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness of Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis From Thailand
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195034069&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleValue in Health Regional Issues
oaire.citation.volume43
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarvard Medical School

Files

Collections