Association between early cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS patients — insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study: a national, multicenter, observational cohort analysis

dc.contributor.authorAhuja S.
dc.contributor.authorde Grooth H.J.
dc.contributor.authorPaulus F.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Ven F.L.
dc.contributor.authorSerpa Neto A.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorTuinman P.R.
dc.contributor.authorAhuja S.
dc.contributor.authorvan Akkeren J.P.
dc.contributor.authorAlgera A.G.
dc.contributor.authorAlgoe C.K.
dc.contributor.authorvan Amstel R.B.
dc.contributor.authorArtigas A.
dc.contributor.authorBaur O.L.
dc.contributor.authorvan de Berg P.
dc.contributor.authorvan den Berg A.E.
dc.contributor.authorBergmans D.C.J.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan den Bersselaar D.I.
dc.contributor.authorBertens F.A.
dc.contributor.authorBindels A.J.G.H.
dc.contributor.authorde Boer M.M.
dc.contributor.authorden Boer S.
dc.contributor.authorBoers L.S.
dc.contributor.authorBogerd M.
dc.contributor.authorBos L.D.J.
dc.contributor.authorBotta M.
dc.contributor.authorBreel J.S.
dc.contributor.authorde Bruin H.
dc.contributor.authorde Bruin S.
dc.contributor.authorBruna C.L.
dc.contributor.authorBuiteman-Kruizinga L.A.
dc.contributor.authorCremer O.L.
dc.contributor.authorDetermann R.M.
dc.contributor.authorDieperink W.
dc.contributor.authorDongelmans D.A.
dc.contributor.authorFranke H.S.
dc.contributor.authorGalek-Aldridge M.S.
dc.contributor.authorde Graaff M.J.
dc.contributor.authorHagens L.A.
dc.contributor.authorHaringman J.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heide S.T.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heiden P.L.J.
dc.contributor.authorHeijnen N.F.L.
dc.contributor.authorHiel S.J.P.
dc.contributor.authorHoeijmakers L.L.
dc.contributor.authorHol L.
dc.contributor.authorHollmann M.W.
dc.contributor.authorHoogendoorn M.E.
dc.contributor.authorHorn J.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Horst R.
dc.contributor.authorIe E.L.K.
dc.contributor.authorIvanov D.
dc.contributor.authorJuffermans N.P.
dc.contributor.authorKho E.
dc.contributor.authorde Klerk E.S.
dc.contributor.authorKoopman-van Gemert A.W.M.M.
dc.contributor.authorKoopmans M.
dc.contributor.authorKucukcelebi S.
dc.contributor.authorKuiper M.A.
dc.contributor.authorde Lange D.W.
dc.contributor.authorvan Mourik N.
dc.contributor.authorNijbroek S.G.
dc.contributor.authorOnrust M.
dc.contributor.authorOostdijk E.A.N.
dc.contributor.authorPaulus F.
dc.contributor.authorPennartz C.J.
dc.contributor.authorPillay J.
dc.contributor.authorPisani L.
dc.contributor.authorPurmer I.M.
dc.contributor.authorRettig T.C.D.
dc.contributor.authorRoozeman J.P.
dc.contributor.authorSchuijt M.T.U.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorSleeswijk M.E.
dc.contributor.authorSmit M.R.
dc.contributor.authorSpronk P.E.
dc.contributor.authorStilma W.
dc.contributor.authorStrang A.C.
dc.contributor.authorTsonas A.M.
dc.contributor.authorTuinman P.R.
dc.contributor.authorValk C.M.A.
dc.contributor.authorVeen-Schra F.L.
dc.contributor.authorVeldhuis L.I.
dc.contributor.authorvan Velzen P.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Ven W.H.
dc.contributor.authorVlaar A.P.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Vliet P.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Voort P.H.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Welie L.
dc.contributor.authorWesselink H.J.F.T.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Wier-Lubbers H.H.
dc.contributor.authorvan Wijk B.
dc.contributor.authorWinters T.
dc.contributor.authorWong W.Y.
dc.contributor.authorvan Zanten A.R.H.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T17:39:21Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T17:39:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Increasing evidence indicates the potential benefits of restricted fluid management in critically ill patients. Evidence lacks on the optimal fluid management strategy for invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that the cumulative fluid balance would affect the successful liberation of invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We analyzed data from the multicenter observational ‘PRactice of VENTilation in COVID-19 patients’ study. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ARDS who required invasive ventilation during the first 3 months of the international outbreak (March 1, 2020, to June 2020) across 22 hospitals in the Netherlands were included. The primary outcome was successful liberation of invasive ventilation, modeled as a function of day 3 cumulative fluid balance using Cox proportional hazards models, using the crude and the adjusted association. Sensitivity analyses without missing data and modeling ARDS severity were performed. Results: Among 650 patients, three groups were identified. Patients in the higher, intermediate, and lower groups had a median cumulative fluid balance of 1.98 L (1.27–7.72 L), 0.78 L (0.26–1.27 L), and − 0.35 L (− 6.52–0.26 L), respectively. Higher day 3 cumulative fluid balance was significantly associated with a lower probability of successful ventilation liberation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.95, P = 0.0047). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Conclusions: In a cohort of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, a higher cumulative fluid balance was associated with a longer ventilation duration, indicating that restricted fluid management in these patients may be beneficial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04346342); Date of registration: April 15, 2020. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care Vol.26 No.1 (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-022-04023-y
dc.identifier.eissn1466609X
dc.identifier.issn13648535
dc.identifier.pmid35650616
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131270278
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/85303
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleAssociation between early cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS patients — insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study: a national, multicenter, observational cohort analysis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131270278&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleCritical Care
oaire.citation.volume26
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationMelbourne Medical School
oairecerif.author.affiliationHogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationCleveland Clinic Foundation
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Israelita Albert Einstein
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationHenry Ford Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationLocation VU Medical Center

Files

Collections