Performance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSadhewa A.
dc.contributor.authorSatyagraha A.W.
dc.contributor.authorAlam M.S.
dc.contributor.authorAdissu W.
dc.contributor.authorAnvikar A.
dc.contributor.authorBancone G.
dc.contributor.authorBharti P.K.
dc.contributor.authorBhutani V.K.
dc.contributor.authorDas S.
dc.contributor.authorHamid M.M.A.
dc.contributor.authorHossain M.S.
dc.contributor.authorNitika N.
dc.contributor.authorOkech B.A.
dc.contributor.authorPanggalo L.V.
dc.contributor.authorTalukdar A.
dc.contributor.authorvon Fricken M.E.
dc.contributor.authorWong R.J.
dc.contributor.authorYilma D.
dc.contributor.authorPrice R.N.
dc.contributor.authorThriemer K.
dc.contributor.authorLey B.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSadhewa A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-14T18:10:49Z
dc.date.available2025-04-14T18:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the main risk factor for severe haemolysis following treatment with 8-aminoquinolines (8AQ). The World Health Organization recommends G6PD testing prior to 8AQ-based hypnozoitocidal treatment. METHODS: We undertook an individual level meta-analysis of the performance of commercially available quantitative point-of-care diagnostics (PoCs) compared with reference spectrophotometry. A systematic literature search (PROSPERO: CRD42022330733) identified 595 articles of which 16 (2.7%) fulfilled pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, plus an additional 4 datasets. In total there were 12,678 paired measurements analyzed, 10,446 (82.4%) by STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, RoK, [SDB]), 2,042 (16.1%) by CareStart G6PD Biosensor (AccessBio, USA, [CSA]), 150 (1.2%) by CareStart Biosensor (WellsBio, RoK [CSW]), and 40 (0.3%) by FINDER (Baebies, USA, [FBA]). FINDINGS: The pooled sensitivities of the SDB when measuring G6PD activity <30% of normal were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.89) for capillary and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99) for venous blood samples. The corresponding values for measuring <70% G6PD activity were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.67-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73-0.96), respectively. The pooled specificity of the SDB was high (>96%) for all blood samples and G6PD activity thresholds. Irrespective of the blood samples and thresholds applied, sensitivity of the CSA did not exceed 62%, although specificity remained high at both 30% and 70% thresholds (>88%). Only one study each for CSW and FBA was included. Sensitivities of the CSW were 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.14) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.89) at the 30% and 70% thresholds, respectively (venous blood samples). Sensitivities of the FBA were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.29-1.00) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.19-0.99) at the 30% and 70% thresholds (venous blood samples). Specificities of the CSW and FBA were consistently high (>90%) at both thresholds. Accuracy of the SDB was higher in females at the 30% cut-off (OR: 3.49, p=0.002) and lower in malaria patients at the 70% cut-off (OR: 0.59, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The SDB performed better than other PoCs. More evidence was available for the performance of the SDB compared to other PoCs, giving higher confidence in its utility in diagnosing G6PD deficiency.
dc.identifier.citationPLoS neglected tropical diseases Vol.19 No.3 (2025) , e0012864
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pntd.0012864
dc.identifier.eissn19352735
dc.identifier.pmid40132008
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002105455
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109515
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePerformance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002105455&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.titlePLoS neglected tropical diseases
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationF. Edward Hebert School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationBadan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute of Endemic Diseases Sudan
oairecerif.author.affiliationJimma University
oairecerif.author.affiliationStanford University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationMenzies School of Health Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Institute of Malaria Research India
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Florida
oairecerif.author.affiliationInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases India
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedical College Kolkata
oairecerif.author.affiliationExeins Health Initiative

Files

Collections