Effect of automated versus conventional ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation-A randomized crossover clinical trial
dc.contributor.author | Buiteman-Kruizinga L.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Neto A.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Botta M. | |
dc.contributor.author | List S.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | de Boer B.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | van Velzen P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bühler P.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wendel Garcia P.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schultz M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | van der Heiden P.L.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Paulus F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Appel R.J.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | van den Berg A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bierlee M.C.W.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boezaart D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boots J.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bosman B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bühler P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fehlbier K.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goossen R.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guseva A.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoekstra-Kapitein C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kleinert E.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Last H. | |
dc.contributor.author | van Leijsen T.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Luttmer-Laven M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Remmerswaal L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schriel-Van den Berg Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sinnige J.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsonas A.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vermeulen T. | |
dc.contributor.correspondence | Buiteman-Kruizinga L.A. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-05T18:07:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-05T18:07:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction Mechanical power of ventilation, a summary parameter reflecting the energy transferred from the ventilator to the respiratory system, has associations with outcomes. INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation is an automated ventilation mode that changes ventilator settings according to algorithms that target a low work-and force of breathing. The study aims to compare mechanical power between automated ventilation by means of INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation and conventional ventilation in critically ill patients. Materials and methods International, multicenter, randomized crossover clinical trial in patients that were expected to need invasive ventilation > 24 hours. Patients were randomly assigned to start with a 3-hour period of automated ventilation or conventional ventilation after which the alternate ventilation mode was selected. The primary outcome was mechanical power in passive and active patients; secondary outcomes included key ventilator settings and ventilatory parameters that affect mechanical power. Results A total of 96 patients were randomized. Median mechanical power was not different between automated and conventional ventilation (15.8 [11.5-21.0] versus 16.1 [10.9-22.6] J/min; mean difference -0.44 (95%-CI -1.17 to 0.29) J/min; P = 0.24). Subgroup analyses showed that mechanical power was lower with automated ventilation in passive patients, 16.9 [12.5-22.1] versus 19.0 [14.1-25.0] J/min; mean difference -1.76 (95%-CI -2.47 to - 10.34J/min; P < 0.01), and not in active patients (14.6 [11.0-20.3] vs 14.1 [10.1-21.3] J/min; mean difference 0.81 (95%-CI -2.13 to 0.49) J/min; P = 0.23). Conclusions In this cohort of unselected critically ill invasively ventilated patients, automated ventilation by means of INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation did not reduce mechanical power. A reduction in mechanical power was only seen in passive patients. | |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS ONE Vol.19 No.7 July (2024) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0307155 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 19326203 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85199940935 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/100238 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Multidisciplinary | |
dc.title | Effect of automated versus conventional ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation-A randomized crossover clinical trial | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199940935&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.issue | 7 July | |
oaire.citation.title | PLoS ONE | |
oaire.citation.volume | 19 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | University of Melbourne | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | UniversitatsSpital Zurich | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Monash University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Medizinische Universität Wien | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Nuffield Department of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Austin Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Reinier de Graaf Hospital - SSDZ | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Dijklander Hospital – Location Hoorn |