Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks
2
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
24654973
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105009034343
Journal Title
Studies in Fungi
Volume
10
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Studies in Fungi Vol.10 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Benchaphong A., Phanthuwongpakdee J., Kwantong P., Nuankaew S., Chuaseeharonnachai C., Koedrith P., Dueramae S., Thongraksa A., Somrithipol S., Hu Y., Wattanavichean N., Boonyuen N. Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks. Studies in Fungi Vol.10 (2025). doi:10.48130/sif-0025-0007 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111055
Title
Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Mycelium-based blocks (MBBs) represent an innovative and eco-friendly approach to composite material design, combining fungal mycelium with lignocellulosic biomass to produce sustainable, rapidly regenerating materials with intrinsic hydrophobic properties. This study investigates the fabrication and characterization of MBBs using Pleurotus ostreatus (Basidiomycota) as the mycelial binding agent and compares its performance with Trichoderma virens (Ascomycota), a non-mushroom mycelial alternative. The performance of both fungal species was assessed using three lignocellulosic substrates: bamboo residues (BRs), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), and rice husks (RHs). Substrates were evaluated individually (100% BRs, SCGs, or RHs) and in binary mixtures at a 50:50 ratio (BRs:SCGs, BRs:RHs, and SCGs:RHs). The physical and mechanical properties—including density, water absorption, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture—were systematically evaluated. Results demonstrated that MBBs composed of BRs and P. ostreatus mycelium achieved the highest average compressive strength (0.190 MPa), outperforming T. virens-based blocks and other MBB formulations. Additionally, blocks incorporating RHs, SCGs, and P. ostreatus exhibited the highest density, reaching 379 kg/m³. In contrast, RH-based blocks with T. virens mycelium showed the highest water absorption, at 294.25%. Overall, MBBs utilizing P. ostreatus mycelium outperformed those with T. virens in key metrics such as density, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture, though water absorption was a notable exception. These findings underscore the potential of MBBs—particularly those incorporating SCGs, BRs, and RHs—as sustainable, non-load-bearing construction materials. Their reduced reliance on conventional resources highlights their promise as eco-friendly alternatives for sustainable applications.