Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks

dc.contributor.authorBenchaphong A.
dc.contributor.authorPhanthuwongpakdee J.
dc.contributor.authorKwantong P.
dc.contributor.authorNuankaew S.
dc.contributor.authorChuaseeharonnachai C.
dc.contributor.authorKoedrith P.
dc.contributor.authorDueramae S.
dc.contributor.authorThongraksa A.
dc.contributor.authorSomrithipol S.
dc.contributor.authorHu Y.
dc.contributor.authorWattanavichean N.
dc.contributor.authorBoonyuen N.
dc.contributor.correspondenceBenchaphong A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T18:10:48Z
dc.date.available2025-07-03T18:10:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractMycelium-based blocks (MBBs) represent an innovative and eco-friendly approach to composite material design, combining fungal mycelium with lignocellulosic biomass to produce sustainable, rapidly regenerating materials with intrinsic hydrophobic properties. This study investigates the fabrication and characterization of MBBs using Pleurotus ostreatus (Basidiomycota) as the mycelial binding agent and compares its performance with Trichoderma virens (Ascomycota), a non-mushroom mycelial alternative. The performance of both fungal species was assessed using three lignocellulosic substrates: bamboo residues (BRs), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), and rice husks (RHs). Substrates were evaluated individually (100% BRs, SCGs, or RHs) and in binary mixtures at a 50:50 ratio (BRs:SCGs, BRs:RHs, and SCGs:RHs). The physical and mechanical properties—including density, water absorption, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture—were systematically evaluated. Results demonstrated that MBBs composed of BRs and P. ostreatus mycelium achieved the highest average compressive strength (0.190 MPa), outperforming T. virens-based blocks and other MBB formulations. Additionally, blocks incorporating RHs, SCGs, and P. ostreatus exhibited the highest density, reaching 379 kg/m³. In contrast, RH-based blocks with T. virens mycelium showed the highest water absorption, at 294.25%. Overall, MBBs utilizing P. ostreatus mycelium outperformed those with T. virens in key metrics such as density, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture, though water absorption was a notable exception. These findings underscore the potential of MBBs—particularly those incorporating SCGs, BRs, and RHs—as sustainable, non-load-bearing construction materials. Their reduced reliance on conventional resources highlights their promise as eco-friendly alternatives for sustainable applications.
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Fungi Vol.10 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.48130/sif-0025-0007
dc.identifier.eissn24654973
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009034343
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111055
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.titleAssessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105009034343&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleStudies in Fungi
oaire.citation.volume10
oairecerif.author.affiliationKunming Institute of Botany
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Science, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationThailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
oairecerif.author.affiliationRajamangala University of Technology Krungthep
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University

Files

Collections