Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
11786981
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85218426337
Journal Title
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Volume
17
Start Page
33
End Page
43
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Vol.17 (2025) , 33-43
Suggested Citation
Malasai K., Jittikoon J., Udomsinprasert W., Talungchit P., Youngkong S., Sangroongruangsri S., Mahasirimongkol S., Chaikledkaew U. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Vol.17 (2025) , 33-43. 43. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S500802 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/106685
Title
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the costs and benefits of genetic testing, specifically mutation analysis and prenatal diagnostic testing, for the confirmation of thalassemia in at-risk pregnancies in Thailand, providing crucial insights to inform public health policy decision-making. Patients and Methods: We analyzed the costs and benefits of following standard screening guidelines, which included a sequence of tests such as mean corpuscular volume (MCV)/mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) with dichlorophenol indophenol precipitation (DCIP), hemoglobin (Hb) typing, genetic testing, and amniocentesis. A decision-tree model was employed for this analysis. The study compared the scenarios with and without genetic testing, adopting a societal perspective that accounted for costs during pregnancy and the lifetime of a child born with thalassemia. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties in the parameters used. Results: The results revealed that adhering to the standard screening program with genetic testing resulted in a cost-savings of approximately 490 USD per prevented thalassemia case. Among the diagnostic methods, the specificity of the MCV/MCH with DCIP showed a higher degree of sensitivity relative to other testing methods, significantly influencing the outcomes. From a governmental perspective, with a full uptake of genetic testing, the incremental budget required was estimated to be 3.7 million USD (131 million THB) for one year. Conclusion: These findings are particularly valuable for policymakers, as they provide robust evidence supporting potential revisions to the reimbursement structure within Thailand’s Universal Health Coverage benefit package, facilitating better management of thalassemia and improving prenatal care.