Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand

dc.contributor.authorMalasai K.
dc.contributor.authorJittikoon J.
dc.contributor.authorUdomsinprasert W.
dc.contributor.authorTalungchit P.
dc.contributor.authorYoungkong S.
dc.contributor.authorSangroongruangsri S.
dc.contributor.authorMahasirimongkol S.
dc.contributor.authorChaikledkaew U.
dc.contributor.correspondenceMalasai K.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-14T18:28:29Z
dc.date.available2025-03-14T18:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the costs and benefits of genetic testing, specifically mutation analysis and prenatal diagnostic testing, for the confirmation of thalassemia in at-risk pregnancies in Thailand, providing crucial insights to inform public health policy decision-making. Patients and Methods: We analyzed the costs and benefits of following standard screening guidelines, which included a sequence of tests such as mean corpuscular volume (MCV)/mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) with dichlorophenol indophenol precipitation (DCIP), hemoglobin (Hb) typing, genetic testing, and amniocentesis. A decision-tree model was employed for this analysis. The study compared the scenarios with and without genetic testing, adopting a societal perspective that accounted for costs during pregnancy and the lifetime of a child born with thalassemia. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties in the parameters used. Results: The results revealed that adhering to the standard screening program with genetic testing resulted in a cost-savings of approximately 490 USD per prevented thalassemia case. Among the diagnostic methods, the specificity of the MCV/MCH with DCIP showed a higher degree of sensitivity relative to other testing methods, significantly influencing the outcomes. From a governmental perspective, with a full uptake of genetic testing, the incremental budget required was estimated to be 3.7 million USD (131 million THB) for one year. Conclusion: These findings are particularly valuable for policymakers, as they provide robust evidence supporting potential revisions to the reimbursement structure within Thailand’s Universal Health Coverage benefit package, facilitating better management of thalassemia and improving prenatal care.
dc.identifier.citationClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Vol.17 (2025) , 33-43
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CEOR.S500802
dc.identifier.eissn11786981
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218426337
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/106685
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
dc.titleCost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85218426337&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage43
oaire.citation.startPage33
oaire.citation.titleClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationThailand Ministry of Public Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahasarakham University

Files

Collections