Mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equity

dc.contributor.authorTan S.Y.
dc.contributor.authorFoo C.D.
dc.contributor.authorVerma M.
dc.contributor.authorHanvoravongchai P.
dc.contributor.authorCheh P.L.J.
dc.contributor.authorPholpark A.
dc.contributor.authorMarthias T.
dc.contributor.authorHafidz F.
dc.contributor.authorPrawidya Putri L.
dc.contributor.authorMahendradhata Y.
dc.contributor.authorGiang K.B.
dc.contributor.authorNachuk S.
dc.contributor.authorWang H.
dc.contributor.authorLim J.
dc.contributor.authorLegido-Quigley H.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-10T17:02:42Z
dc.date.available2023-06-10T17:02:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-01
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic had an inequitable and disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, reversing decades of progress toward healthy populations and poverty alleviation. This study examines various programmatic tools and policy measures used by governments to support vulnerable populations during the pandemic. A comparative case study of 15 countries representing all World Health Organization's regions offers a comprehensive picture of countries with varying income statuses, health system arrangements and COVID-19 public health measures. Through a systematic desk review and key informant interviews, we report a spectrum of mitigation strategies deployed in these countries to address five major types of vulnerabilities (health, economic, social, institutional and communicative). We found a multitude of strategies that supported vulnerable populations such as migrant workers, sex workers, prisoners, older persons and school-going children. Prioritising vulnerable populations during the early phase of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, direct financial subsidies and food assistance programmes were the most common measures reported. Additionally, framing public health information and implementing culturally sensitive health promotion interventions helped bridge the communication barriers in certain instances. However, these measures remain insufficient to protect vulnerable populations comprehensively. Our findings point to the need to expand fiscal space for health, enlarge healthcare coverage, incorporate equity principles in all policies, leverage technology, multi-stakeholder co-production of policies and tailored community engagement mechanisms.
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science and Medicine Vol.328 (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116007
dc.identifier.eissn18735347
dc.identifier.issn02779536
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160830467
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/83013
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectArts and Humanities
dc.titleMitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equity
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85160830467&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleSocial Science and Medicine
oaire.citation.volume328
oairecerif.author.affiliationHanoi Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitas Gadjah Mada
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Health Foundation, Thailand
oairecerif.author.affiliationLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University of Singapore
oairecerif.author.affiliationGates Foundation

Files

Collections