No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production
3
Issued Date
2025-08-01
Resource Type
ISSN
08938849
eISSN
17497345
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105012478196
Journal Title
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Volume
56
Issue
4
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society Vol.56 No.4 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Sritunyalucksana K., Sanguanrut P., Srisala J., Thawonsuwan J., Saleetid N., Vanichviriyakit R., Chotwiwatthanakun C., Flegel T.W., Taengchaiyaphum S. No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society Vol.56 No.4 (2025). doi:10.1111/jwas.70046 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111627
Title
No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The main purpose of this report is to provide hard evidence that the shrimp parvovirus, infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV), has not resulted “in significant consequences, for example, production losses, morbidity or mortality at a zone or country level” in Thailand since at least 2010. It also reveals that no single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is sufficient to identify IHHNV-infected shrimp. It presents historical evidence and new evidence from 11 commercial ponds cultivating the giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon in Thailand. These ponds were selected because they were the ponds that gave positive PCR test results for IHHNV using two methods recommended for IHHNV diagnosis by World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) (IHHNV-309 and IHHNV-389). However, an additional in-house “IHHNV Long-amp method” (IHHNV-LA) was also used to amplify 90% of the 4-kb IHHNV genome sequence, and it also gave false-positive test results with 2 of the 11 ponds (IHHNV-LA positive, but histological tests negative). Further tests using normal histopathological analysis for the presence of pathognomonic Cowdry A type inclusions (CAI), in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) could confirm IHHNV infections in only two of the three ponds PCR-positive using all three PCR methods. In addition, positive detection of CAI alone was equivalent to ISH or IHC in confirming IHHNV infection after a positive test with any of the PCR methods used. In summary, the recommended WOAH PCR methods gave false-positive test results for IHHNV infection with 9/11 ponds (82%). All 11 ponds gave profitable harvests despite the confirmation of IHHNV in two ponds, where it was accompanied by various additional pathogens. Unfortunately, according to current practice, positive PCR test results with the WOAH methods alone sometimes leads to rejection of traded shrimp products without assurance that the test results are not false-positive results that may arise from endogenous viral elements (EVE).