No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production

dc.contributor.authorSritunyalucksana K.
dc.contributor.authorSanguanrut P.
dc.contributor.authorSrisala J.
dc.contributor.authorThawonsuwan J.
dc.contributor.authorSaleetid N.
dc.contributor.authorVanichviriyakit R.
dc.contributor.authorChotwiwatthanakun C.
dc.contributor.authorFlegel T.W.
dc.contributor.authorTaengchaiyaphum S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSritunyalucksana K.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-15T18:14:59Z
dc.date.available2025-08-15T18:14:59Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this report is to provide hard evidence that the shrimp parvovirus, infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV), has not resulted “in significant consequences, for example, production losses, morbidity or mortality at a zone or country level” in Thailand since at least 2010. It also reveals that no single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is sufficient to identify IHHNV-infected shrimp. It presents historical evidence and new evidence from 11 commercial ponds cultivating the giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon in Thailand. These ponds were selected because they were the ponds that gave positive PCR test results for IHHNV using two methods recommended for IHHNV diagnosis by World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) (IHHNV-309 and IHHNV-389). However, an additional in-house “IHHNV Long-amp method” (IHHNV-LA) was also used to amplify 90% of the 4-kb IHHNV genome sequence, and it also gave false-positive test results with 2 of the 11 ponds (IHHNV-LA positive, but histological tests negative). Further tests using normal histopathological analysis for the presence of pathognomonic Cowdry A type inclusions (CAI), in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) could confirm IHHNV infections in only two of the three ponds PCR-positive using all three PCR methods. In addition, positive detection of CAI alone was equivalent to ISH or IHC in confirming IHHNV infection after a positive test with any of the PCR methods used. In summary, the recommended WOAH PCR methods gave false-positive test results for IHHNV infection with 9/11 ponds (82%). All 11 ponds gave profitable harvests despite the confirmation of IHHNV in two ponds, where it was accompanied by various additional pathogens. Unfortunately, according to current practice, positive PCR test results with the WOAH methods alone sometimes leads to rejection of traded shrimp products without assurance that the test results are not false-positive results that may arise from endogenous viral elements (EVE).
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the World Aquaculture Society Vol.56 No.4 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jwas.70046
dc.identifier.eissn17497345
dc.identifier.issn08938849
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012478196
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111627
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.titleNo single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105012478196&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.titleJournal of the World Aquaculture Society
oaire.citation.volume56
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Science, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationThailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
oairecerif.author.affiliationThailand Department of Fisheries
oairecerif.author.affiliationSongkhla Aquatic Animal Health Research Center

Files

Collections