Publication: Prevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: Findings from a multicountry household survey
Issued Date
2011-07-01
Resource Type
ISSN
1931843X
15409996
15409996
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-79960208237
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Women's Health. Vol.20, No.7 (2011), 1097-1109
Suggested Citation
Terence Hull, Adriane Martin Hilber, Matthew F. Chersich, Brigitte Bagnol, Aree Prohmmo, Jennifer A. Smit, Ninuk Widyantoro, Iwu Dwisetyani Utomo, Isabelle François, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Marleen Temmerman Prevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: Findings from a multicountry household survey. Journal of Women's Health. Vol.20, No.7 (2011), 1097-1109. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2281 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12461
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Prevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: Findings from a multicountry household survey
Abstract
Background: Women worldwide use various vaginal practices to clean or modify their vulva and vagina. Additional population-level information is needed on prevalence and motivations for these practices, characteristics of users, and their adverse effects. Methods: This was a household survey using multistage cluster sampling in Tete, Mozambique; KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Yogyakarta, Indonesia; and Chonburi, Thailand. In 2006-2007, vaginal practices and their motivations were examined using structured interviews with women 18-60 years of age (n=3610). Results: Prevalence, frequency, and motivations varied markedly. Two thirds of women in Yogyakarta and Chonburi reported one or more practices. In Yogyakarta, nearly half ingest substances with vaginal effects, and in Chonburi, external washing and application predominate. In Tete, half reported three or four current practices, and a quarter reported five or more practices. Labial elongation was near universal, and 92% of those surveyed cleanse internally. Two third's in KwaZulu-Natal practiced internal cleansing. Insertion of traditional solid products was rare in Chonburi and Yogyakarta, but one tenth of women in KwaZulu-Natal and nearly two thirds of women in Tete do so. Multivariate analysis of the most common practice in each site showed these were more common among less educated women in Africa and young urban women in Asia. Explicit sexual motivations were frequent in KwaZulu-Natal and Tete, intended for pleasure and maintaining partner commitment. Practices in Chonburi and Yogyakarta were largely motivated by femininity and health. Genital irritation was common at African sites. Conclusions: Vaginal practices are not as rare, exotic, or benign as sometimes assumed. Limited evidence of their biomedical consequences remains a concern; further investigation of their safety and sexual health implications is warranted. Copyright © 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.