Publication: Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite
5
Issued Date
2017-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20057814
20057806
20057806
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85013943386
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. Vol.9, No.1 (2017), 38-44
Suggested Citation
Porntida Visuttiwattanakorn, Kallaya Suputtamongkol, Duangjai Angkoonsit, Sunattha Kaewthong, Piyanan Charoonanan Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. Vol.9, No.1 (2017), 38-44. doi:10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.38 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/42441
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strengths (MTBSs) of two types of indirect resin composites bonded to a conventional direct resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Indirect resin composite blocks of Ceramage and SR Nexco were prepared in a plastic mold having a dimension of 10 × 10 × 4 mm. These composite blocks were divided into three groups according to their surface treatments: Group1: Sandblast (SB); Group2: Sandblast and ultrasonically clean (SB+ UL); Group3: Sandblast plus silane (SB+SI). After bonding with direct resin composite, indirect-direct resin composite blocks were kept in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C and cut into microbars with the dimension of 1 × 1 × 8 mm. Microbar specimens (n = 40 per group) were loaded using a universal testing machine. Failure modes and compositions were evaluated by SEM. The statistical analyses of MTBS were performed by two-way ANOVA and Dunnett's test at α =.05. RESULTS. Surface treatments and brands had effects on the MTBS without an interaction between these two factors. For SR Nexco, the MTBSs of SB and SB+SI group were significantly higher than that of SB+UL. For Ceramage, the MTBSs of SB and SB+SI were significantly higher than that of SB+UL. The mean MTBS of the Ceramage specimens was significantly higher than that of SR Nexco for all surface treatments. CONCLUSION. Sandblasting with or without silane application could improve the bond strengths of repaired indirect resin composites to a conventional direct resin composite.