Publication: Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
32
Issued Date
2021-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14333023
09373462
09373462
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85121488712
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Urogynecology Journal. (2021)
Suggested Citation
Wanchat Komon, Jittima Manonai, Athasit Kijmanawat, Chatchawan Silpakit, Bhatarachit Tunkoon, Ketkaew Jengprasert, Sirirat Sarit-apirak Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ). International Urogynecology Journal. (2021). doi:10.1007/s00192-021-05020-5 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78543
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) was developed and validated to assess women’s knowledge regarding etiology, diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to translate and validate a Thai version of the PIKQ to use as a tool to evaluate knowledge of POP and UI among Thai-speaking women. Methods: The English PIKQ, which comprises the PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI sections, was translated into Thai. Psychometric properties of the final version of the Thai PIKQ were tested for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability among 168 women attending a gynecology clinic and 150 nurses. Results: Regarding content validity of the final Thai PIKQ, the number of missing items was 0. Participants in the nurse group were more likely than those in the patient group to select the correct answer for all items for the POP scale and UI scale (P < 0.001). For internal consistency testing, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.745 for the PIKQ-POP and 0.754 for the PIKQ-UI scales, suggesting that the items had relatively high internal consistency. The item-total correlation values ranged from 0.204 to 0.539, showing an adequate correlation of each item with the scale overall. The correlation coefficients between the test and retest for PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI were 0.685 and 0.735, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The Thai PIKQ is a simple instrument which shows good validity and high reliability and could be a useful tool for assessing knowledge regarding POP and UI in clinical practice.